Do you know ?

because of cancer they remove the whole stomach,pancreas,gallbladder,l... intestine due to the advanced developments surrounded by the medicine paddock.for example if they remove the large intestine the river will not absorbed from the surplus materials(feacal matter) .if they remove those organs then which will do the functions of those organs?i hold read in books that due to the removal of the stomach ,intestine(because of cancer)people are competent to develop anemia due to unability of the absorption of the vitaminB12 ,folic sour .Do you know ?
Yes thats right but there must be something else contained by medical studies that support this theory and if it be that we could find another way of functioning lacking the cancer by removing organs, then i guess thats the solely way. I dont have an idea that they would remove them if it were to endanger someones time.
the body is meant to own all its parts, living in need a whole body is a goad for the patient and the doctors who attention to detail for him.
heard one and the same about gastric bypass surgery.
First of adjectives, just have cancer in a unshakable body part does not expect they just up and remove it. They other try chemo and radiation first. Removing the offending part is other a last application and even then they never remove the complete thing, but solely as little as they can.
The kind of surgery referred by you is a sort of ending attempt in cases of 4+ stage cancer i.e. cancer which have spread all over. Patient undergo such an surgery survive for few days or weeks and during such period he/she is provided beside supportive care, including I.V. fluids knowledgeable of giving required energy for body functions/survival.